Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars.com

Club of Rome wants new "system of governance" to enforce eco-fascism

The same secretive organization that admittedly manufactured the global warming threat in 1990 is still pushing the same hoax today, with the Club of Rome issuing an alarmist report predicting a catastrophic rise in temperatures that will decimate the planet.

"Rising carbon dioxide emissions will cause a global average temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius by 2052 and a 2.8 degree rise by 2080, as governments and markets are unlikely to do enough against climate change, the Club of Rome think tank said," reports Reuters.

The report, entitled, 2052: A Global Forecast for the Next Forty Years, decries improving living standards in developing countries and warns that man-made climate change could eventually kill off humans entirely.

Although the report has generated a deluge of coverage in the establishment media, not one of those news stories points out that the Club of Rome admittedly manufactured the "idea" of man-made global warming back in 1990.

On page 75 of their 1990 publication entitled The First Global Revolution, the organization outlined how they would manufacture ecological scares in order to manipulate the public into accepting the imposition of a dictatorial world government run by them.

"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself," states the report, which can be read in full at the end of this article.

Wattsupwiththat.com

Once again the models are proved wrong.

The government forecasters (NOAA) claims we're in a long term moderate to severe drought LINK HERE here is Minnesota.
But the reality is quite different. Most of the "Moderate to Severe Long Term drought areas have seen 200% to 600% of "normal" rainfall over last 30 days.

Read the article here.

GIZMODO

Dinosaur Farts Caused Jurassic Global Warming

A lot of dinosaurs were big eating machines. Now, scientists have calculated how much gas they would have expelled as a result of their digestion--and the quantities they produced probably meant that they warmed their own climate through letting rip.

Scientists from Liverpool John Moore's University in the UK have calculated the methane output of sauropods--the dinosaur family which includes the species known as Brontosaurus--by comparing their digestive system to that of cows. The results predict that the world's population of dinosaurs would have produced around 520 million tonnes of methane annually. The research is published in Current Biology.

Sauropods were massive land animals that grazed on vegetation--but it's the microscopic organisms living inside them that were responsible for the gas. David Wilkinson, one of the researchers, explains to the BBC:

Read the rest of the article here.

Las Vegas Sun

In a letter delivered Wednesday to GOP Chairman Michael McDonald, the RNC's chief counsel said if Ron Paul delegates are allowed to take too many slots for the national convention, Nevada's entire contingent may not be seated in Tampa.

WorldNetDaily

Regional chief submits resignation, boasting of 'integrity, hard work'

The regional Environmental Protection Agency executive who told an audience his "philosophy of enforcement" was to "crucify" and "make examples of" energy companies has quit.

It a letter to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson over the weekend, Al Armendariz, the former top environmental official in the South and Southwest Region, said he regretted the comments but boasted of his "integrity and hard work."

"As I have expressed publicly, and to you directly, I regret comments I made several years ago that do not in any way reflect my work as regional administrator," he wrote. "As importantly, they do not represent the work you have overseen as EPA administrator."

He continued, "I take great pride in having built a career based on integrity and hard work. These are the principles that guide me personally as well. While I feel there is much work that remains to be done for the people of this country in the region that I serve, after a great deal of thought and careful consideration, I have come to the conclusion that my continued service will distract you and the agency from its important work."

Read the rest of the article here.

By Ron Paul, ronpaul2012.com

"I wonder when the Department of Labor will forbid parents from requiring children to make their beds, clean their rooms, or set the table for dinner." - Ron Paul

LAKE JACKSON, Texas - Congressman and 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul issued the following statement regarding the Department of Labor's new regulations applying child labor laws to family farms.

Below find comments from Congressman Paul:

"The Department of Labor's plan to issue new regulations applying child labor laws to family farms is an outrageous assault on America's farmers. My parents were dairy farmers who required me and my brothers to help out on the farm. I certainly benefited from this experience, and, as a Representative of a congressional district containing a large number of farmers, I have had the opportunity to meet many farmers who learned about their profession by doing chores on their parents' farms. Working on a family farm also provides a tremendous opportunity to form a strong work ethic that these children will carry through the rest of their lives.

"Thanks to the Obama Administration, future generations of children will be deprived of these experiences.

By Paul Conner, The Daily Caller

Under pressure from farming advocates in rural communities, and following a report by The Daily Caller, the Obama administration withdrew a proposed rule Thursday that would have applied child labor laws to family farms.

Critics complained that the regulation would have drastically changed the extent to which children could work on farms owned by family members. The U.S. Department of Labor cited public outcry as the reason for withdrawing the rule.

"The decision to withdraw this rule -- including provisions to define the 'parental exemption' -- was made in response to thousands of comments expressing concerns about the effect of the proposed rules on small family-owned farms," the Department said in a press release Thursday evening. "To be clear, this regulation will not be pursued for the duration of the Obama administration."

Read the rest of the article here.

By Kevin DeAnna, WorldNetDaily

Sen. James Inhofe is calling for an investigation into a top Environmental Protection Agency administrator who confessed that his "philosophy of enforcement" was to "crucify" and "make examples of" energy companies.

And an author of a book on such behavior, Eco-Tyranny: How the Left's Green Agenda will Dismantle America," says it's just too much.

Region VI Administrator Al Armendariz has apologized for his remarks, but meteorologist and author Brian Sussman points out that this is only the surface of a much deeper problem with the federal bureaucracy.

In an exclusive interview with WND, Sussman asked, "Would the EPA official have apologized for his contemptuous crucifixion declaration if he had not been caught on tape? Of course not. His statement is a perfect representation of eco-tyranny."

In his explosive new book of that title, Sussman details how what he calls "green authoritarianism" was inevitable from the beginning. He explains that Richard Nixon, who "wanted to be liked," according to one of his well-known former advisers, created the Environmental Protection Agency as an olive branch to the hard left. As Sussman jokes, "Needless to say, it was not returned."

Read the rest of the article here.

By Elmer Beauregard

You may not have heard this in the Mainstream Press but Ron Paul won Minnesota.

There were 4 Congressional District Conventions last weekend and Ron Paul won 10 out of a possible 12 National Delegates, the weekend before he won 9 out of 9. Ron Paul so far has won 20 out of a possible 24 National Delegate slots. There are still 13 slots up for grabs at the Minnesota State Convention where Ron is positioned to do quite well.

Minnesota has 40 Delegates going to the National Convention 24 of which have already been selected: 20 for Ron Paul, 2 for Santorum, 1 for Romney and 1 unknown. Even if another candidate manages to win all 13 slots plus the 3 Super Delegate positions at the State Convention he won't be able to match Ron Paul's 20.

By Paul Jospeh Watson, PrisonPlanet.com

The European Space Agency is set to green light a new surveillance satellite that will measure man-made carbon emissions from space in order to "hunt down" violators of international climate agreements, allowing Big Brother to enforce a future tax on CO2 emissions.
New Big Brother Satellite to Hunt Down Carbon Criminals

Labeled CarbonSat, the satellite system will have the ability to differentiate between natural carbon emissions and man-made CO2 releases. Earlier this month, the ESA announced that it had contracted space company Astrium to develop the satellite, which will be ready for deployment by 2017.

The Astrium press release announcing the project makes no mention of the fact that the satellite will be used to perform surveillance on individuals and businesses to keep tabs on their carbon footprint, instead presenting its role as merely measuring carbon emissions.

However, an interview with Astrium President Evert Dudok carried by a German climate alarmist website makes it clear that the technology will be used to spy on human activity from space and impose penalties for non-compliance with United Nations environmental treaties and regulations.

According to a translation by the prominent climate skeptic website No Tricks Zone, Dudok reveals that the primary function of the satellite will be to perform highly intrusive surveillance.

"The target is to hunt down environmental violators," said Dudok, adding that the satellite will have the capability to detect methane as well as CO2, meaning farmers, whose activity is already policed by a network of spy satellites and drones, could face fines and taxes depending on the flatulence levels of their livestock.

Read the rest of the article here.

Tune in from 3 to 6 PM and listen to Elmer Beauregard on KKMS with Brad Brandon.

Elmer will have his guitar and will be revealing his new Earth Day Song.

Listen to it here.

ScienceDaily

Twice as many emperor penguins as thought in Antarctica, first-ever penguin count from space shows

(Apr. 13, 2012) -- A new study using satellite mapping technology reveals there are twice as many emperor penguins in Antarctica than previously thought. The results provide an important benchmark for monitoring the impact of environmental change on the population of this iconic bird, which breeds in remote areas that are very difficult to study because they often are inaccessible with temperatures as low as -58 degrees Fahrenheit.

Read the rest of the article here.

By Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet.com

Global warming alarmists debunked yet again by reality

Even as climate alarmists amplify their call for a worldwide tax on carbon dioxide emissions in the name of preventing global warming - penguins, polar bears, Himalayan glaciers and Arctic sea ice are all thriving.
Penguins, Polar Bears, Glaciers, Arctic Ice All Thriving 1 top 10 najubavi ptici vo svetot

With dire proclamations of ice free Arctic summers vehemently debunked, the latest data indicates that both wildlife and the environment in earth's coldest regions has not experienced the catastrophic devastation predicted as a result of man-made climate change.

Forecasts that Canada's polar bear population would significantly decline due to global warming have been proven completely inaccurate. The latest study shows that the Hudson Bay area polar bear population has remained steady at around 1000 - the same number found by a 2004 study, confounding the "doom-and-gloom" predictions of environmentalists about the demise of the polar bear (which) have failed to come true," reports the Canadian Press.

Read the rest of the article here.

by Paul Waldie, The Globe and Mail

The debate over the polar-bear population has been raging for years, frequently pitting scientists against Inuit. - The debate over the polar-bear population has been raging for years, frequently pitting scientists against Inuit.

The debate about climate change and its impact on polar bears has intensified with the release of a survey that shows the bear population in a key part of northern Canada is far larger than many scientists thought, and might be growing.

The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear subpopulations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That's 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears' ability to hunt. The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it's considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic.

The study shows that "the bear population is not in crisis as people believed," said Drikus Gissing, Nunavut's director of wildlife management. "There is no doom and gloom."

Mr. Gissing added that the government isn't dismissing concerns about climate change, but he said Nunavut wants to base bear-management practices on current information "and not predictions about what might happen."

The study's conclusions drew concern from Andrew Derocher, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Alberta who has been studying polar-bear populations for years. Prof. Derocher said the 1,013 figure is derived from a range of 717 bears to 1,430. "It's premature to draw many conclusions," he said, adding that there were no comparative figures and the upper end of the range, 1,430, was highly unlikely.

Read the rest of the article here.

wattsupwiththat.com

International scientific community issues first "State of the Planet Declaration"

Scientists issued the first "State of the Planet" declaration at a major gathering of experts on global environmental and social issues in advance of the major UN Summit Rio+20 in June.

The declaration opens: "Research now demonstrates that the continued functioning of the Earth system as it has supported the well-being of human civilization in recent centuries is at risk." It states that consensus is growing that we have driven the planet into a new epoch, the Anthropocene, where many planetary-scale processes are dominated by human activities. It concludes society must not delay taking urgent and large-scale action.

"This is a declaration to our globally interconnected society," said Dr Lidia Brito, director of science policy, natural sciences, UNESCO, and conference co-chair.

"Time is the natural resource in shortest supply. We need to change course in some fundamental way this decade," she added.

Over 3,000 experts in climate change, environmental geo-engineering, international governance, the future of the oceans and biodiversity, global trade, development, poverty alleviation, food security and more discussed the intricate connections between all the different systems and cycles governing our ocean, air, land and the human and animal life dependent on those environments.

Read the rest of the article here.

Mail Online

An Oregon University professor has controversially compared skepticism of global warming to racism.

Sociology and environmental studies professor Kari Norgaard wrote a paper criticizing non-believers, suggesting that doubters seem to have a 'sickness'.

The professor, who holds a B.S. in biology and a master's and PhD in sociology, argued that 'cultural resistance' to accepting humans as being responsible for climate change 'must be recognized and treated' as an aberrant sociological behavior.

Resolving skepticism about climate change alarmists, she added, is a challenge equitable to overcoming 'racism or slavery in the U.S. South'.

In the last 30 years, Norgaard said, climate change has been seen as either a hoax or fixable with minimal political or economic intervention.

'This kind of cultural resistance to very significant social threat is something that we would expect in any society facing a massive threat', she said.

Norgaard added that effective international action on climate change is being hampered by 'weak' responses to the crisis by both individuals and societies.

'We must first be aware that this resistance is happening at all levels of our society.

'If you have to push a heavy weight, it doesn't mean it can't be moved, but in order to push it you had better know that you have something heavy and figure out how to move it -- where to put the lever to shift the weight.'

Read the rest of the article here.

March 28, 2012
The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001
Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA's history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA's advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA's current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

See the rest of the article here.

By Joseph Castro, Christian Science Monitor

The world's oceans have been warming for more than 100 years, twice as long as previously believed, new research suggests.

The findings could help scientists better understand the Earth's record of sea-level rise, which is partly due to the expansion of water that happens as it heats up, researchers added.

"Temperature is one of the most fundamental descriptors of the physical state of the ocean," said the study's lead author,Dean Roemmich, an oceanographer at the University of California, San Diego. "Beyond simply knowing that the oceans are warming, [the results] will help us answer a few climate questions."

From 1872 to 1876, the HMS Challenger sailed the world's oceans along a 69,000-nautical-mile track, crossing the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans. During the voyage, scientists among the 200-person crew took 300 ocean-temperature profiles, or measurements at several depths in each spot, with pressure-protected thermometers.

Roemmich and his colleagues compared Challenger temperatures with data from the modern-day Argo project, which uses 3,500 free-drifting floats to measure the temperature and salinity, or salt content, of the world's oceans every 10 days. The comparison showed a 1.1-degree Fahrenheit (0.59-degree Celsius) temperature increase at the ocean's surface over the last 135 years, a result corroborated by a large body of sea-surface temperature data that goes back more than 100 years. [The World's Biggest Oceans and Seas]

Read the rest of the article here.

By Alan Caruba, wattsupwiththat.com

The Environmental Protection Agency is using its power to advance the objective of the environmental movement to deny Americans access to the energy that sustains the nation's economy and is using the greatest hoax ever perpetrated, global warming--now called "climate change"--to achieve that goal.

"This standard isn't the once-and-for-all solution to our environmental challenge," said Lisa Jackson, the EPA administrator, "but it is an important commonsense step toward tackling the ongoing and very real threat of climate change and protecting the future for generations to come. It will enhance the lives of our children and our children's children."

This is a boldfaced lie. Its newest rule is based on the debasement of science that is characterized and embodied in the global warming hoax. It will deprive America of the energy it requires to function.

Since the 1980s the Greens have been telling everyone that carbon dioxide was causing global warming--now called climate change--and warning that CO2 emissions were going to kill everyone in the world if they weren't dramatically reduced. The ball was put in motion with the United Nations 1997 Kyoto Protocols when many nations agreed to this absurd idea and carried forward by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ever since.

Read the rest of the article here.

We all emit 1,000 pounds of CO2 every year just by breathing. Is the EPA going to start regulating that too?

By Juliet Eilperin, The Washington Post

The Environmental Protection Agency will issue the first limits on greenhouse gas emissions from new power plants as early as Tuesday, according to several people briefed on the proposal. The move could end the construction of conventional coal-fired facilities in the United States.

The proposed rule -- years in the making and approved by the White House after months of review -- will require any new power plant to emit no more than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt of electricity produced. The average U.S. natural gas plant, which emits 800 to 850 pounds of CO2 per megawatt, meets that standard; coal plants emit an average of 1,768 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt.

Read the rest of the article here.

By William Happer, Wall Street Journal

The observed response of the climate to more CO2 is not in good agreement with predictions.

During a fundraiser in Atlanta earlier this month, President Obama is reported to have said: "It gets you a little nervous about what is happening to global temperatures. When it is 75 degrees in Chicago in the beginning of March, you start thinking. On the other hand, I really have enjoyed nice weather."

What is happening to global temperatures in reality? The answer is: almost nothing for more than 10 years. Monthly values of the global temperature anomaly of the lower atmosphere, compiled at the University of Alabama from NASA satellite data, can be found at the website http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/. The latest (February 2012) monthly global temperature anomaly for the lower atmosphere was minus 0.12 degrees Celsius, slightly less than the average since the satellite record of temperatures began in 1979.

The lack of any statistically significant warming for over a decade has made it more difficult for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and its supporters to demonize the atmospheric gas CO2 which is released when fossil fuels are burned. The burning of fossil fuels has been one reason for an increase of CO2 levels in the atmosphere to around 395 ppm (or parts per million), up from preindustrial levels of about 280 ppm.

CO2 is not a pollutant. Life on earth flourished for hundreds of millions of years at much higher CO2 levels than we see today. Increasing CO2 levels will be a net benefit because cultivated plants grow better and are more resistant to drought at higher CO2 levels, and because warming and other supposedly harmful effects of CO2 have been greatly exaggerated. Nations with affordable energy from fossil fuels are more prosperous and healthy than those without.

Read the rest of the article here.

Aerosmith will begin its 18-date summer tour this June at the Minneapolis Target Center. They're calling it the 'Global Warming' tour. I'm not sure why they're calling it the 'Global Warming' tour or why they are starting in Minnesota, maybe they saw our website.

By Elmer Beauregard

I was listening to MPR this morning doing their best to defend President Obama's energy policy, which he calls his "All of the Above Plan". Obama is taking credit for all the oil being sucked out of the ground by our neighbor to the west, North Dakota, by saying America is producing more oil now then it was 4 years ago. This may be true but it is in spite of Obama's policies not because of them.

Obama went on to say in order to reduce our dependence on foreign oil we must pursue alternative energy such as Wind and Solar. So really when Obama says "All of the Above" he means "Above Ground", because clearly he wants all energy sources in America that are below ground to stay there.

It seems like every week another "Green Energy" company that got billions from the U.S. Tax payers goes belly up. Maybe that's where the term "Green Energy"comes from.

The Main Stream Press has also been saying that the president can't control gas prices. This may be true also but if Obama held a press conference tomorrow and said he was opening up ANWR to drilling, allowing offshore drilling in the Gulf and was allowing the Canadian pipeline to go through, oil prices would fall immediately.